|

| |
It is our intention to
answer Biblical questions from our visitors to our website. We will only
respond to questions concerning Scripture and we will not argue or fuss with
anyone. It is not our intention to confuse or anger, but to attempt to assist
those who are seeking Christ. The email address to have questions addressed
is:
E-MAIL
Thanks for visiting our site.
May God Bless,
Pastor Rick
PS We will post the questions and answers on our website to help others,
but we will not publish the name of the questioner.
|
|
Question: (1) I've been told that all the Old Testament books
that have 1st and 2nd is?
Because
they were originally written in Hebrew which has no vowels and therefore
shorter than the Greek which was almost twice as long and couldn't be
written on one scroll so they were divided into 1st and 2nd.
Is this true?
Response (1) From Pastor Rick:
I had not heard that, but I guess it
is true. Here is an article from the
Lumina Bible Software Encyclopedia confirming that information and detailing
it.
First and Second Samuel derive their names from the individual whom God used
to establish kingship in Israel. Samuel is the most
prominent figure in the
early narratives of 1 Samuel. His key role in leading the nation of Israel
through the transition from the period of the judges to that of the monarchy
warrants the use of his name as the title for the book.
These books, however, have not always been so
designated, nor was the
material originally divided into two books. As far as is known, the
Septuagint (the Greek translation of the OT dating from the third century
BC) translators were the first to separate the material of Samuel into two
books (they made a similar division in the material of Kings). The Hebrew
original of these books was written, as is characteristic of Hebrew, with
symbols only for consonants and none for vowels. When translated into Greek,
it was necessary to use symbols for both vowels and consonants, thus greatly
lengthening the manuscript. Presumably the practical consideration of the
length of the scroll was the cause for dividing the material of both Samuel
and Kings into two books (scrolls) instead of retaining just one. The
Septuagint translators, recognizing the continuity of content and emphasis
in Samuel and Kings, designated what is now known as 1 and 2 Samuel as "The
First and Second Books of Kingdoms" and then designated what now is known as
1 and 2 Kings as "The Third and Fourth Books of Kingdoms." The Latin Vulgate
(the Latin translation of the Bible prepared by Jerome in the late fourth
century AD) slightly modified the Septuagint titles to "First, Second,
Third, and Fourth Kings." These titles were utilized all through the
Middle
Ages and were modified into our present titles by the Protestant
Reformers
in the 16th century AD in agreement with Jewish rabbinic tradition. The
Reformers, however, retained the division into two books, and this has been
followed in modern English versions
Pastor Rick Barcus
|
|
|
Question: (2)
In Nehemiah 8:1, what is meant by
"water gate"?
Response (2)From Pastor Rick:
In Nehemiah 8:1,
what is meant by "water gate"?
Nehemiah
3:26 Moreover the
Nethinims dwelt in Ophel, unto the
place over against the water gate toward the east, and the tower that
lieth out.
There were several gates or
entrances to the City of Jerusalem in Nehemiah’s
time and at the present. The water gate was used to bring water into
the city from the Spring of Gihon. It is
here, apparently, that Hezekiah dug the tunnel during the siege of the
Assyrians. (2nd Chronicles
32:30 This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper watercourse
of Gihon, and brought it straight down to
the west side of the city of David. And Hezekiah prospered in all his
works.) Water in the Bible is typical of the Word of God. It is by the
Word that we are cleansed from the pollution of the world.
it was not an accident that this is where
Ezra set up his pulpit to teach the Word of God. By the way, that is
what preachers and teachers are today. Our job is to carry water (the
Word) to the people so they can be cleansed. Jesus provided that water
because He is the Word of God. (John 1:1)
Psalm 119:9 Wherewithal shall a young
man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto
according to thy word.
John 15:3 Now ye are clean through the
word which I have spoken unto you.
John 17:17
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
Notice this gate did not need
repairs. All of the other gates are mentioned as someone doing repairs
to them. Not this gate! Somehow, it survived the invasion intact. The
Word of God does not need fixed either. It stands by its own power. We
do not need to make it better; we need to preach and teach it just like
it is. It is perfect just as God gave it to His people.
Hebrews
4:12 “For
the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any
two-edged sword, piercing even to the
dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and
is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.”
|
|
|
Question: (3) Is there
anything in the Bible alluding to a "female" angel or any other
position in heaven? I've heard there is no gender in heaven but references
to Angels always seem to have a male name?
Response (3)From Pastor Rick:
As far as we can tell there is no
female or male in heaven. God created men and women, male and female, for
the purpose of populating the earth. There will be no children conceived in
heaven so the reason for different sexes will be eliminated. Here is the
verse where Jesus informs us that heaven will be gender neutral; there will
be no marriage or giving in marriage. The two phrases have the connotation
of the groom and bride. Matthew
22:30 For in the resurrection they
neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in
heaven.
We only know the names of two angels
from the Scripture that I am aware of; Gabriel and Michael. There are two
others spoken of in Jewish tradition as standing around the throne of God;
Uriel and Raphael, but they are not mentioned in
the Bible. These are all male names, but I believe angels are ministering
spirits (Hebrews
1:14)
and can appear in whatever form God desires them to in order to deliver
messages to human beings. They always seem to appear with human, male
similarities, but that doesn’t mean they appear that way in heaven. Gabriel
and Michael are both spoken of as arch-angels in
theologic circles. Michael is called an arch-angel in the Scripture;
Gabriel is not, but is assumed to be one in church tradition. It is assumed
by many that Gabriel is the one who will blow the trumpet at the Rapture,
but the Scripture does not say that as far as I can tell. Here is what is
said exactly. 1st
Thessalonians 4:16 “For the Lord himself
shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and
with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:”
Here are the verses
which contain the names of these two angels.
-
Jude
1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when
contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not
bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
-
Daniel 8:16
And I heard a man's voice between the banks of Ulai,
which called, and said, Gabriel, make this man to understand the vision.
-
Daniel 9:21 Yea, whiles I was
speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at
the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of
the evening oblation.
-
Daniel 10:13
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days:
but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I
remained there with the kings of Persia.
-
Daniel 10:21
But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and
there is none that holdeth with me in these
things, but Michael your prince.
-
Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall
Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth
for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such
as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that
time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written
in the book.
-
Revelation 12:7-9 And there was war
in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the
dragon fought and his angels, 12:8
And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
12:9 And the great
dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which
deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out
into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
-
Luke
1:19 And the angel answering said
unto him, I am Gabriel, that stand in the presence of God; and am sent to
speak unto thee, and to show thee these glad tidings.
-
Luke
1:26
And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of
Galilee, named Nazareth,
The name Gabriel means man of God
Michael= who is like God
Raphael=
(the
divine healer).
Uriel=
God is my light
|
|
|
Question: (4)
Isn't there a verse in the bible that comes close to saying: Before the
foundation of the earth (or something similar) I Am?
Response (4)From Pastor Rick:
Here are the verses
in Scripture which deal with the existence of Jesus Christ before the
foundations of the world were created. The word translated foundation
means fixed or established.
JOB
38:4 Where wast
thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare,
if thou hast understanding.
Psalm
102:25 Of old hast thou laid the foundation of
the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands.
Psalm
104:5 Who laid the foundations of the earth,
that it should not be removed for ever.
Isaiah
48:13 Mine hand also hath laid the foundation
of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto
them, they stand up together.
Isaiah
51:13 And forgettest
the LORD thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the
foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of
the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy?
and where is the fury of the oppressor?
Zechariah 12:1
The burden of the word of the LORD for
Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth
the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the
earth, and formeth the spirit of man within
him.
Ephesians
1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him
before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without
blame before him in love:
Hebrews
1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the
beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the
works of thine hands:
1st Peter 1:19-20
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish
and without spot: 1:20 Who verily was foreordained
before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times
for you,
I think the verse
you are thinking of may be one of these two:
John
17:24 Father, I will that
they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may
behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou
lovedst me before the foundation of the world.
John 8:58
Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before
Abraham was, I am.
Thanks for the great
question.
Pastor Rick
Question: (5)
I have to ask this
….as I read my morning scripture I found Psalm 110:3:
Thy
people shall be willing in the day of thy powers, in the beauties of
holiness from the womb of the morning, thou
hast the dew of thy youth.
First off, what
lovely wording; secondly, this is talking about Christ? The whole chapter
seems to be about victory in the end.
Thanks,
Response (5)From Pastor Rick:
This Scripture is
definitely about Christ. Verse one of this chapter is quoted in the New
Testament in Matthew, Mark, and Luke by Jesus Himself as proof of His
mission as Messiah.
Psalm 110:1
“A Psalm of David. The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand,
until I make thine enemies thy footstool.”
Verse 4 is quoted in Hebrews Chapter 5 defending the right of Jesus as our
heavenly High Priest. The phrases in this verse seem to mean as I can
best determine:
-
“Thy people shall
be willing in the day of thy power,” The word translated willing is not
an adjective in the original Hebrew, but a plural noun meaning His
people would be willing sacrifices unto Him in the day of His power.
The day of His power would seem to be the day He comes to put down all
evil and to set up the Millennial
Kingdom. The Church has already offered themselves.
Romans 12:1 “I beseech you
therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies
a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable
service.”
-
“in
the beauties of holiness” His church will be adorned with the most
beautiful garments God can manufacture. Their robes reflect the
righteousness of the saints, but only after they have been washed in the
blood of the Lamb. Our holiness is as filthy rags without the
intervention of the blood of Jesus Christ.
Revelation
7:14 “And I said unto him, Sir, thou
knowest. And he said to me,
These are they which came out of great
tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the
blood of the Lamb.” Ephesians 5:27
“That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot,
or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without
blemish.”
“from
the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.” Let me give you
two commentaries on this section which I think will be a blessing to you.
This is from the Pulpit Commentaries: Some understand it of Messiah
himself, and explain, “As the dew of the morning, abundant, refreshing,
spreading far and wide, miraculous, so is the might of thy perpetual
youth” (‘Speaker’s Commentary,’ vol. 4. p. 428); others, and the larger
number, interpret it of Messiah’s army, “As dew out el the early morning
dawn, descending by a silent, mysterious birth from the star-lit heaven,
so comes to Messiah his mighty host of followers” The other is from the
JFB Commentary: “The word "youth" denotes a period of life distinguished
for strength and activity (compare
Ecclesiastes 11:9)--the
"dew" is a constant emblem of whatever is refreshing and strengthening (
Proverbs 19:12,
Hosea 14:5).
The Messiah, then, as leading His people, is represented as continually in
the vigor of youth, refreshed and strengthened by the early dew of God's
grace and Spirit. Thus the phrase corresponds as a member of a parallelism
with "the day of thy power" in the first clause. "In the beauties of
holiness" belongs to this latter clause, corresponding to "Thy people" in
the first, and the colon after "morning" is omitted. Others prefer: Thy
youth, or youthful vigor, or body, shall be constantly refreshed by
successive accessions of people as dew from the early morning; and this
accords with the New Testament idea that the Church is Christ's body
(compare
Micah 5:7).”
What a beautiful and
inspiring Scripture this is!
Pastor Rick Barcus
Question: (6):
The Role of women in the church
Hi Pastor Rick...........
Hopefully you remember me as
one of your devoted students.
I am teaching every Tuesday
evenings the upcoming Sunday school lesson. My environment at these
sessions includes some deacons, ministers/pastors and upcoming teachers.
One of the ministers brought up
the point that the bible says that women should not teach or preach.
He gave me the following scriptures to support this statement: 1Timothy
2:12,
"I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she
must be silent." . . . and 1Corin.14:33-40, "For God is not a
God of disorder but of peace. As in all the congregations of the saints,
women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allwed to speak,
but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about
something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is
disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church. Did the word of God
originate with you? Or are you the only people it has reached? If anybody
thinks he is a prophet or spiritually gifted, let him acknowledge that
what I am writing to you is the Lord's command. If he ignores this, he
himself will be ignored. Therefore, my brothers, be eager to prophesy,
and do not forbid speaking in tongues. But everything should be done in a
fitting and orderly way."
If you can fit it in your
schedule, I would be most greatful to get your theory on this, other
scriptures, and/or any information you care to offer to clarify these
passages.
In His Love.......
Response (6) :
This question bothers a lot of folks in today’s church. Women have
progressed in society towards equality with men a great deal since the
days of the Bible. That does not change the Word of God though. I think
we need to examine these texts very closely to see exactly what the
Apostle Paul is trying to say.
1) 1st
Timothy 2:11-12 “Let the woman learn in silence with all
subjection. 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to
usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.” I think we need to
understand the definitions of two words in this Scripture to get the
meaning of the directive. First, the word silence means “quietness.” It
does not mean not to speak at all, but to be calm and under control. We
must remember that under the law a woman was not allowed to participate in
Temple Worship in any way whatsoever. The Grace Dispensation opened a lot
of doors for women to participate in the church services. When this
occurred, I understand from some Church history, that women would
interrupt the services right in the middle to ask questions of the
speaker. This is why the Apostle instructed them to ask their husbands at
home. I don’t think this was an admonition not to speak, but a caution to
not interrupt. The second word is “teach.” The word is connected to the
following phrase “nor to usurp authority over the man.” I don’t think
this means that a woman cannot teach at all in the church; I think it
means she should not teach with the understanding that she is unchallenged
or the final authority on religious or moral matters. The modern teacher
is more of a discussion leader than what this Scripture is calling a
teacher. She does not demand a man line up to her ideas. She is just
directing the discussion and pointing out Biblical principles.
2) 1st
Corinthians 14:33-40 “For God is not the author of confusion, but
of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 14:34 Let your women
keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak;
but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at
home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. 14:36
What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only?
14:37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him
acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of
the Lord. 14:38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant. 14:39
Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with
tongues.
14:40 Let all
things be done decently and in order.” This is the Scripture I referred
to as speaking on the interruption of the church service by women asking
questions. I think that is why the Apostle used the phrases “let them ask
their husbands at home” and “God is not the author of confusion.” Paul
didn’t want the services interrupted with endless questions breeding
confusion from these new congregants. The emphasis is on causing
confusion. Remember women at this time would have had very limited, if
any, education and very little religious instruction. This would’ve all
been new to them. I want to re-iterate once again, I don’t think the
Apostle is offended that women are speaking, but the manner in which they
are choosing to speak. I want to give you some other thoughts on women in
ministry.
A)
Most of the churches and preachers who most vociferously argue against
women teaching in the church are not being honest in this matter. They
will not allow a woman to teach, but they will allow them to sing,
testify, and pray. If they choose to interpret “silence” as an
admonishment not to teach, it ought to be an admonishment not to speak at
all. Also many allow women to teach children in Sunday School classes.
This Scripture does not say they can’t teach men, but they can teach
children. If they want to say no women teachers; that should mean no
women teachers anywhere. You must be honest in your line drawing.
B)
The Bible does not contradict itself; especially when the same writer is
involved. I will give you 3 examples from this same Apostle Paul which
seem to allow women to be involved in the worship service or teaching.
-
Acts
18:24-26 “And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria,
an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus. 18:25
This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the
spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing
only the baptism of John. 18:26 And he began to speak boldly in
the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him
unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.”
Apollos was an eloquent speaker, but didn’t understand the mission of
Jesus Christ. He only knew of the doctrine of John the Baptist. The
husband and wife team of Aquila and Priscilla took him under their wing
and instructed him in the ways of Christ. I had a preacher tell me once
that Aquila taught and Priscilla made coffee, but the Scripture does not
say that, or even hint that. It says “they took him unto
them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.” I think it
is clear they both taught him.
-
1st
Corinthians 11:5 “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth
with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one
as if she were shaven.” If it was forbidden for a woman to speak in the
church at all, then why is Paul instructing them to have their head
covered when they pray or prophesy? If they were to stay silent they
shouldn’t be praying or prophesying anyhow. The word “prophesy” means
to speak with divine inspiration, to discharge the office of a prophet,
or under Spiritual prompting, to teach, refute, reprove, admonish, or
comfort others. It seems to me that the Apostle understands that women
are speaking in the church. We would call this prophesying today
testifying or teaching. They were doing it and Paul does not admonish
them for doing it. We know the Evangelist Phillip had four daughters
who prophesied. Acts 21:8-9 “And the next day we that
were of Paul's company departed, and came unto Caesarea: and we entered
into the house of Philip the evangelist, which was one of the seven; and
abode with him. 21:9 And the same man had four daughters,
virgins, which did prophesy.” There is no Biblical admonishment for
these girls, but the Bible seems to be commending them.
-
Romans 16:1
“I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church
which is at Cenchrea:” The word translated “servant” is the Greek word “diakonos.”
It is the word from which we get the word deacon. It means a servant or
waiter. It denotes the office of deacon in a local church. Was Phebe a
deacon in this church at Cenchrea? Were not sure, but there seems to be
a hint that she might’ve been.
Lastly I, (this is
my opinion; others, I’m sure, think contrarily as they have a right to) do
think there is an office of which a woman should not participate. I
believe the office of Pastor, sometimes called Bishop in the Bible should
be held by men only. Two reasons make me think this way. First of all,
Jesus chose 12 Apostles; they were all men. When Judas Iscariot committed
suicide, his replacement was a man. The Apostle to the Gentiles, Paul,
was a man. It seem clear Jesus is intending men to occupy the office of
Bishop or Pastor. Secondly, one of the qualifications for a bishop is to
be the “husband of one wife.” (1st Timothy 3:2) That
clearly indicates a male. The underlying reason I think this office is
intended for men only is the authority issue. I do believe men should be
the head of their household. (Ephesians 5:23)That is another topic
for another time of which I can’t get into now. (by the way, that is not
a license to mistreat a wife; don’t forget they are to love their wives as
their own flesh) If a man is to be the leader of his household; it holds
he should be the leader of the church as well.
I hope I have helped
answer this question. It is a difficult one, but one that should be asked
and talked about in the church today. I don’t claim to have Apostolic
authority; some disagree with me; they have that right. I have only
attempted to answer as honestly and as Biblically correct as I can.
One more hint I will
give to women who feel the call to teach, but are bothered by questions on
this matter. The Holy Spirit is to be the Christian’s guide. If you feel
led to teach and are not condemned by doing so; I say go for it. do the
best you can and do it as unto the Lord. I think God is in the
arrangement!
Pastor Rick Barcus
|
|
|
Question:(7)
THANK YOU, I HAVE
ANOTHER QUESTION OR YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOU’RE A PASTOR. JESUS SAID THAT HE
CAME NOT TO BE SERVED BUT TO SERVE, ALSO HE SAID THAT BIRDS HAVE NESTS,
FOXES HAVE HOLES, BUT THE SON OF MAN HAS NO PLACE TO LAY HIS HEAD. I HEARD
SOMETHING THAT I’M HAVING TROUBLE WITH. MY PASTOR SAID WHILE IN THE PULPIT
THAT THE CONGRAGATION IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE CARE OF HIM. NOW I BELIEVE WE ARE
TO HONOR HIM AND HIS FAMILY. TO ME THAT TOOK THE FOCUS FROM JESUS AND THE
CARE OF THE ENTIRE BODY AS A WHOLE. THE FIRST FAMILY SHOULD SET THE EXAMPLE
OF OFFERING THEMSELVES TO THE CONGRAGATION. WE ARE ALL SERVANTS. PAUL SAID
IF WE DON’T WORK WE DON’T EAT. I DON’T KNOW MAYBE IT WAS THE WAY IT SOUNDED
LIKE A MANDATE. AM I WRONG FOR MY THOUGHTS THIS HAS BEEN IN MY SPIRIT SINCE
I HEARD THIS.
I’m not sure of what the
Brother means by “take care of him.” Ministers of the gospel are to offer
their lives as servants of the church, but I want to make sure I’m clear on
this one opinion concerning pay for preachers. Preachers who Pastor
churches and evangelists who are in full time ministry should be paid a
living wage by the church or organization sponsoring their ministries, if it
is at all possible. The Bible is clear on the matter: Let me list a few
Scriptures to back up this assertion:
Response(7)
|
1st Corinthians 9:14
Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should
live of the gospel.
9:15
But I have used none of these things: neither have I written these
things, that it should be so done unto me: for it were better for me to
die, than that any man should make my glorying void. 9:16
For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for
necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the
gospel! 9:17 For if I do this thing willingly, I have a
reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is
committed unto me. 9:18 What is my reward then? Verily
that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without
charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.
A few points on this Scripture. The point is made by the
Apostle Paul that those who preach the gospel should live of the
Gospel. In other words, they should receive their living because of
their ministering the word to the body of Christ. The key word here is
“should.” This wage should be offered by the church, not demanded by
the Pastor. I have been a Pastor since 1987 and I’ve never asked for a
raise or a salary from the church. When I was elected Pastor my first
wage was $100 per month. I am now a full time minister, but the church
is the one who sets the wages I receive. I never demand a certain
amount. As for myself, and myself alone, I also set the same standard
in my extracurricular activities. I have received money for preaching
funerals, weddings, singing, etc. but I’ve never set a price for
performing these tasks. I tell folks they are free to give a donation,
but whether they do or not and the amount is up to them. I refuse to
set a price. I don’t require, or expect, any other preacher should
follow my example. I do it because, like Paul, I don’t want anyone to
think I’ve abused my power in the gospel. I believe God will provide
for my needs. I rely on Him to put in the hearts of folks to support my
living. If that doesn’t happen, I will get a job. I will not demand
wages from the believers. Paul worked with his own hands to provide for
his needs, but that was not the plan God intended for an Apostle of
Christ. It was to the shame of the churches that they made it necessary
for this great man of God to leave his ministry to sew tents.
1st Timothy 5:17
Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double
honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. 5:18
For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out
the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
The word honor means “reward,
stipend, or wages. —Adam Clarke's Commentary” It is clear that the
amount of pay should be tied to how well a minister is performing his
job. If the church is half empty, he can’t expect to be paid a bunch of
money. If the church is prospering, they should pay him more. (double
honour) I think a good rule for a church as to how much to pay the
preacher is what I call “in the same manner the congregation is
living.” If the church is populated with folks who are well off, they
should pay a good wage. If the church is a working class church, then
the Pastor should expect a working class wage. If the church is poor,
he probably will not be able to live of his ministry. I know many good,
honest preachers who work in the secular world because their churches
are unable to provide them a living. I lived that way myself for well
over 10 years. I admire their dedication, but they will never achieve
their full capacity as a minister when they are torn between earning a
living in the world and working for the Kingdom. They will be limited
in time for study and visitation. The church will get what they are
paying for; a part time Pastor.
I render this opinion in
humility and without judging others. This is how I read the Scripture
on this matter. No one must agree with me, but I do think folks should
follow the ideals of the Word of God. If more believers would pay
what’s due to the Lord the church would prosper so much moiré in so many
ways.
May God Bless,
Pastor Rick Barcus
|
|
|